Foundation Sponsored Funding
The University of Utah Foundation Relations program can help build a relationship between you and potential private funding partners. Our
team can advise on strategic approaches, arrange visits, review draft proposals and
help translate ideas into fundable projects or programs. Please contact Lynn Marsella Wong if you are interested in applying for an opportunity listed below. You may also find
additional funding opportunities on the foundation relations website.
Brain & Behavior Research Foundation: Young Investigator Grant
Deadline: March 25, 2021
Amount: Up to $70,000 over two years
The BBRF Young Investigator Grant program is intended to facilitate innovative research opportunities and supports basic as well as translational and/or clinical investigators. All research must be relevant to the understanding, treatment and prevention of serious psychiatric disorders such as: schizophrenia; bipolar; mood and anxiety disorders (for a complete list, see the front page of the application); or early onset brain and behavior disorders. In addition to supporting the full ranges of relevant neurobiological and psychobiological basic science, the foundation also supports clinical science, which can include careful studies using qualitative research approaches or research generating preliminary data to explore a new hypothesis generated by clinical experience or large sample studies. The BBRF Young Investigator Grant is not sufficient to support expensive large sample patient-based studies but it may be possible to attach a study to a clinical project already under way or for which other funding has become available. Some examples of preliminary clinical studies include:
- Support for an add-on study to identify a biomarker in the context of an ongoing clinical trial.
- Determining if a computer-based cognitive or other remediation enhances effectiveness of cognitive agents.
- Proof of principle study to see if efficacy is detected with a new treatment.
- Testing a novel hypothesis within an already established data set.
James S. McDonnell Foundation Opportunity Awards
Deadline: April 9, 2021
Amount: $250,000 over 2-4 years
Through the Opportunity Awards, JSMF is seeking to fund projects leading to new conceptual and empirical studies of cognition and behavior that recognize the dynamic nature of cognition and behavior, are situated in real world contexts, cross levels of analysis, unite traditionally separate domains of inquiry (e.g. vision and speech), embrace complexity, and consider how behavior is influenced by interactions among individuals. JSMF is encouraging researchers to pursue important questions using conceptual and methodological approaches that takes seriously the trajectories, biological and experiential, contributing to the ongoing development of cognition and behavior occurring across the lifespan.
Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative (SFARI): 2021 Bridge to Independence
Award
Deadline: April 12, 2021 (for Letters of Inquiry)
Grant Amount: $495,000 over three years
The Bridge to Independence Award program engages talented early-career scientists in autism research by facilitating their transition to research independence. Awardees receive a commitment of $495,000 over three years, activated upon assumption of a tenure-track professorship. The foundation welcomes applications that span the breadth of science that SFARI normally supports, including genetics, molecular mechanisms, circuits and systems, and clinical science. While the foundation encourages applications from scientists who are working on autism-related projects, this award is also open to researchers who are not currently working on autism but who are interested in starting research projects in this area and have expertise that could be brought to bear on this complex condition.
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation: Systems and Services Research to Build a Culture of
Health
Deadline: April 30, 2021 (1-page Letter of Intent)
Amount: Up to $500,000 over 36 months
Achieving racial equity and health equity in American communities requires effective solutions to the "wrong-pocket problem": we invest in systems that are designed to improve social and economic conditions—such as housing, transportation, education, income, and employment assistance; child and family supports; and legal and criminal justice services—but the financial benefits of these often flow elsewhere, in reduced costs for medical care from diseases and injuries prevented. This creates imbalances in power, information, and financial resources that exist across medical, social, and public health systems—a fundamental problem that confronts many attempts at meaningful cross-sector collaboration. Such solutions must allow collaborating organizations to equitably share in the costs and the benefits of multisector collaborative initiatives, and to share in the power and influence that govern these initiatives. This call for proposals will provide funding for new research to rigorously test and evaluate innovative solutions to the wrong-pocket problem that persists across health and social service systems.
Russell Sage Foundation
Deadline: May 4, 2021 (for Letters of Inquiry)
Amount: up to $175,000
For its next deadline, the Russell Sage Foundation will accept letters of inquiry related to Behavioral Economics; Decision Making & Human Behavior in Context; Future of Work; and Social, Political, and Economic Inequality. The Foundation will also accept letters of inquiry relevant to any of its core programs that address at least one of the following issues:
- Research on the Covid-19 pandemic and the resulting recession in the U.S. Specifically, research that assesses the social, political, economic, and psychological causes and consequences of the pandemic, especially its effects on marginalized individuals and groups and on trust in government and other institutions.
- Research focused on systemic racial inequality and/or the recent mass protests in the U.S. Specifically, research that investigates the prevalence of racial disparities in policing and criminal justice and their social, political, economic, and psychological causes and consequences; the effects of the current social protest movement and mass mobilization against systemic discrimination; the nature of public attitudes and public policies regarding policing, criminal justice, and social welfare; and the effects of those attitudes in the current political environment.
William. T. Grant Foundation: Research Grants on Reducing Inequality and Research
Grants on Improving the Use of Research Evidence
Deadline: May 5, 2021 (letters of inquiry)
Amount: up to $600,000 over 2-3 years for Research Grants on Reducing Inequality; up to $1M
over 2-4 years for Research Grants on Improving the Use of Research Evidence
The William T. Grant Foundation’s mission is to support research to improve the lives of young people ages 5-25 in the United States. The foundation invests in high-quality field-initiated studies on reducing inequality in youth outcomes. They seek studies that aim to build, test, or increase understanding of programs, policies, or practices to reduce inequality in the academic, social, behavioral, or economic outcomes of young people, prioritizing studies about reducing inequality on the basis of race, ethnicity, economic standing, language minority status, or immigrant origins. Studies may be from a range of disciplines, fields, and methodologies, and the foundation encourages investigations into various systems, including justice, housing, child welfare, mental health, and education. The most competitive proposals often incorporate data from multiple sources and often involve multi-disciplinary teams.
Applications for research grants on reducing inequality must:
- Identify a specific inequality in youth outcomes, and show that the outcomes are currently unequal by engaging with the extant literature on the causes and consequences of inequality.
- Make a compelling case for the basis of inequality the study will address.
- Articulate how findings from your research will help build, test, or increase understanding of a specific program, policy, or practice to reduce the specific inequality that you have identified.
Proposals for studies on improving the use of research evidence must pursue one of the following lines of inquiry:
- Identify or test strategies to improve the use of existing research.
- Identify or test strategies for producing more useful research evidence.
- Test the assumption that using high-quality research evidence improves decision making and youth outcomes.
Categories
Featured Posts
Blog Archive
- Quarter1 2018 (1)
- April 2019 (26)
- August 2019 (17)
- December 2019 (10)
- February 2019 (25)
- July 2019 (14)
- June 2019 (16)
- March 2019 (17)
- May 2019 (13)
- November 2019 (8)
- October 2019 (20)
- September 2019 (14)
- April 2020 (13)
- August 2020 (10)
- December 2020 (11)
- February 2020 (12)
- January 2020 (10)
- July 2020 (9)
- June 2020 (7)
- March 2020 (30)
- May 2020 (10)
- November 2020 (15)
- October 2020 (21)
- September 2020 (19)
- April 2021 (10)
- August 2021 (21)
- December 2021 (12)
- February 2021 (17)
- January 2021 (10)
- July 2021 (11)
- June 2021 (17)
- March 2021 (21)
- May 2021 (14)
- November 2021 (16)
- October 2021 (15)
- September 2021 (16)
- April 2022 (8)
- February 2022 (14)
- January 2022 (9)
- June 2022 (12)
- March 2022 (22)
- May 2022 (14)
Tag Cloud
- VPR (5)
- Research (2)
- Highlights (1)
- DMA (1)
- Mentorship (1)
- Graduate School (1)
- Awards (2)
- Libraries (2)
- Marriott (2)
- Web of Science (1)
- R01 (1)
- Grant Writing (1)
- CCTS (2)
- Corporate (2)
- Funding (5)
- Foundations (2)
- DRA (2)
- Distinguished Research (1)
- URC (1)
- COVID19 (2)
- Symposium (1)
- 3i (1)
- Collections (1)
- Grant (1)
- COA (2)
- Aging (2)
- Intramural (1)
- Corporate Funding (1)
- Foundations Funding (1)
- NSF (1)
- CAREER (1)
- REd (2)
- Research Education (2)
- REnalytixAI (1)
- PIVOT Center (1)
- Grant Review (1)
- CBR (1)
- PIVOT (1)